| |||||
|
Metallurgical Analysis -
Crucible Steelby Motoyasu
Before this process was discovered, what smiths did was gather up
unprocessed iron ore, and forge together into a billet much like the
Japanese did with their tamahagane, then bake the billet for several days
in a bed of coal so that a bit of carbon would go into the surface and
become steel (case steel), the billet would have been folded, and the
baking process repeated many times to get the carbon up to an appropriate
level, and then it would be forged into a sword. The Europeans in general
didn't fold nearly as many times as the Japanese, so there were
many impurities left in the resulting steel.
The crucible process that the Spanish first obtained from the Moors
allowed them to make the smelted steel, which would have been of vastly
superior quality to the other materials of the time, and so, Spain, in
particular, Toledo, got its reputation for superior swords. Of course,
the technology quickly spread, and before long, everyone had access to
smelting technology.
The difference between the early European crucible steel and Damascus is
partly in the composition (Wootz Damascus is of extremely high carbon
content - well over 2%, and it also has a significant silicon content),
and partly in the processing - instead of forging the billet at high heat, a
Damascus billet was worked at relatively low heat and hammered over and
over again to break up the steel grains - it takes on a property known as
"superplasticitity" which allows it to be forged at low temperatures
despite its incredibly high carbon content. Also, because of the high
carbon content, a lot of hard carbides form in the steel and
precipitate out, and these carbides are visible in the surface of the
finished blade and form the "watering" that true Wootz Damascus is famous
for.
Of course, the actual process is much more complex than it sounds, if
you're interested in it, see the article in the Scientific American.
|
| TOP MENU | SECTION INDEX | FEEDBACK | BACK |